Learner Reviews & Feedback for Understanding Research Methods by University of London
About the Course
Top reviews
JV
Nov 28, 2020
A well made lesson with focus of what matters the most in research. The university of London along with Coursera did a great job at pointing out how research topics should be approached.Thank you
AB
Sep 9, 2019
very good course. The last e-activity was proposal preparation. It will be good if they add something about sampling in reading materials. Very good experience for me.....I will recommend this course
2676 - 2700 of 2,774 Reviews for Understanding Research Methods
By Emil
•Jul 13, 2020
This was definitely a strange course.
By Muhammad U
•Dec 20, 2023
please include some assignments
By Md M I K I
•May 20, 2023
This course need more contents.
By Mhmad J H
•Mar 30, 2023
good, could be better
By AUGUSTINE K K
•Jul 11, 2022
a nice course to take
By Dissanayake M B D D
•Aug 8, 2020
great work. loved it.
By Francisco P
•May 29, 2018
It is a basic course
By dimithra d
•Apr 29, 2024
just interviews only
By Moses M M
•Dec 14, 2022
It is quite shallow
By Moetaz s
•Aug 22, 2017
Good For Beginners
By CALIMANUT I C
•Feb 28, 2019
too basic I'd say
By Meroona G
•Oct 21, 2017
Need improvement
By Nicolas-Patience B
•Oct 6, 2015
Helpful insight.
By MAHIMA
•May 19, 2020
Good initiative
By Ung T L
•Jun 17, 2022
Underwhelming
By Vaishnavi.N
•Jun 19, 2020
Good learning
By Dr. S M A T
•Aug 13, 2020
Good Course.
By dylan s l c
•Mar 17, 2025
masomenos
By Alfredo C M
•Sep 22, 2016
esta bien
By hafid i
•May 10, 2020
was good
By AM G
•Sep 16, 2022
not bad
By Varghese J (
•Nov 8, 2019
Average
By tewodros t
•Jun 23, 2025
thanks
By Deleted A
•Dec 21, 2024
good
By jaime v s
•Dec 16, 2019
I found the course useful because it made me think of a project I am working on. How ever, I found it way too short, I completed the four weeks in for days of light work (between 1-2 hours). I found the feedback I received a disappointment, with usually just a line of writing saying "good job", which seems to me that students just fill it up as a requirement. I found the chapters most useful, and I think it was a good call making the tasks around them; that being said, most of the work I reviewed (about this chapters) wasn´t about the chapters or the task at hand. I don´t know how others reviewed but I suspect they didn´t care and put up a passing grade. I would´ve liked more serious evaluations, and more tasks for that matter -maybe two for each week, one for the videos and one for a chapter-. Talking about the videos, I found them interesting but mostly too short and on the surface. I know the price is low because of the limitations present, but I don´t think that's excuse for the lack of content.